Loading…
Loading…
Tag
70 posts with this tag.
·10 min read
Texas TRAIGA carries civil penalties up to $200,000 per violation plus up to $40,000 per day for continuing violations. The safe harbor, an affirmative defense, is substantial NIST AI RMF compliance. This checklist covers what you need and how to use the 60-day cure period.
·11 min read
Boards are now accountable for AI governance failures. SEC expects AI risk disclosure, and the EU AI Act requires governance at the highest level. This guide covers what quarterly AI reports to boards should contain and a copy-paste template.
·10 min read
Shadow AI adds $670K to breach costs, and small teams have the highest exposure. How to detect unsanctioned AI tools and govern them without an IT team.
·12 min read
EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and the White House AI executive order all include red-teaming requirements for AI systems. This guide covers what red-teaming means for AI, what testing is required at each risk tier, and how small teams can comply.
·10 min read
Colorado replaced its original AI Act with SB 26-189, signed May 14, 2026. The new law drops bias audits and impact assessments in favor of a lighter notice-and-transparency framework. Effective January 1, 2027, it requires pre-use notice, post-adverse-action notice within 30 days, and 3-year recordkeeping for any employer using AI in hiring, promotions, or terminations.
·9 min read
The EU provisional agreement pushed high-risk AI obligations to late 2027. But Article 50 transparency rules still apply August 2, 2026, GPAI requirements have applied since August 2, 2025, and the prohibited-practices ban has been in force since February 2, 2025. Here is exactly what changed and what did not.
·11 min read
When your AI agent sends a wrong email, makes a bad purchase, or deletes data, the law says you are responsible, not the AI. Here is what small teams must do before deploying autonomous agents in 2026.
·10 min read
AI-powered employee monitoring is now subject to specific laws in 11+ US states and GDPR in Europe. This guide covers what disclosures are required, what's prohibited, and how to build a compliant monitoring policy.
·9 min read
Texas TRAIGA requires explicit consent before collecting biometric data in AI hiring tools, even from public sources. Here's what HR teams and AI vendors using facial recognition, voice analysis, or video interviews must do.
·10 min read
NYC Local Law 144 is no longer the only AI bias audit requirement. Colorado, Minnesota, and New Jersey all have active requirements for HR teams using algorithmic decision tools in 2026. Here's what each state requires and what a multi-state employer must do.
·10 min read
Standard vendor questionnaires no longer satisfy regulators. The Treasury FS AI RMF (February 2026) requires independent testing, bias audits, and hallucination measurement. Here's a practical assessment framework for teams evaluating ChatGPT Enterprise, Claude, Gemini, and similar tools.
Showing 12 of 70 posts.