Skip to main content
0 days

Colorado ADMT rules: hearing and last day for written comments · Oct 26, 2026 · See what changes

US Federal·Lapsed

CFPB Guidance on AI in Credit Decisioning (Circular 2022-03, withdrawn)

Dates and status re-checked against primary sources on October 11, 2026. How we verify

In 2022 the CFPB issued Circular 2022-03, saying lenders must give specific, accurate reasons for adverse action even when a complex algorithm made the decision. The CFPB withdrew that circular on May 12, 2025, along with many other guidance documents. The underlying rule still applies: ECOA and Regulation B require specific reasons in an adverse action notice, so 'the model said no' is not enough. Separately, a final rule published April 22, 2026 and effective July 21, 2026 amended Regulation B to provide that ECOA does not authorize disparate-impact liability.

What this means for your team

If your product uses AI to make or assist in credit decisions, such as loan underwriting or credit line setting, you must still be able to explain specifically and accurately the factors behind each adverse decision. The withdrawal does not remove that duty, because it comes from the regulation and not the circular. Disparate-impact theories are narrower under ECOA after the 2026 rule, so check state law and other federal laws that may still apply. Models that cannot produce interpretable reasons for their outputs are a compliance risk.

Key requirements

  • Adverse action notices must state specific reasons for the credit decision (ECOA, Regulation B)
  • 'The model said no' or generic checklist reasons are not enough
  • If an AI model drives the decision, you need to be able to say which factors actually drove it
  • Circular 2022-03 was withdrawn on May 12, 2025; the regulation it interpreted was not
  • Regulation B was amended on April 22, 2026 (effective July 21, 2026): ECOA does not authorize disparate-impact liability
← All regulations